islamisering

Selvforsvar (upassende begejsting)

BT.dk beretter fra Tyskland, at folket rører på sig og yder modstand mod den planlagte tvangsislamisering. Fra artiklen:

Et tidligere hotel i den tyske by Bautzen skulle inden længe huse op mod 300 flygtninge og migranter. Den plan ser ud til umiddelbart ud til at være udskudt, da bygningen pludselig stod i flammer natten til søndag.

Mens et stort opbud af brandfolk forsøgte at få branden under kontrol, stod 20-30 fulde mænd og jublede over flammerne. Flere af dem prøvede endda at forhindre brandmændene i at slukke branden.

To unge mænd på 20 år blev anholdt for gadeuorden, og ifølge AFP var det lokale politi ikke i tvivl om, hvad mændene havde gang i.

»Gruppen udviste en upassende begejstring over branden og kom med nedsættende kommentarer omkring brandfolkenes indsats,« siger en talsmand fra politiet.

Fremgang for ordentlige skoler

BT kan fortælle, at andelen af elever i privat drevne skoler fortsætter fremgangen. Her på UH er vi ikke i tvivl om, at det i høj grad kan tilskrives den stigende islamisering af det offentlige skolevæsen. Antallet af elever i de private skoler skulle være vokset til 15,5 %. Af det samlede elevtal formoder vi.

Fra artiklen, om de særlige forhold i København:

I København er flugten fra folkeskoler til privatskoler standset, og her går det endda den modsatte vej.

For fem år siden gik over 26 procent af de mindste klasser i privatskoler, mens det nu kun er 24 procent. Det skyldes ifølge Jyllands-Posten blandt andet, at organisationen »Brug Folkeskolen« har haft succes med at opsøge forældre i børnehaver på eksempelvis Nørrebro for at fortælle om den lokale folkeskole.

Vi tvivler. Der er nok snare tale om, at andelen af etnisk danske potentielle elever er faldet som følge af, at forældrene ikke bare fravælger en islamiseret folkeskole, men en islamiseret by.

Germans get there sanity back

A article at dw.de reports that people finaly has got enough of being fed up with so called “multiculturalism” an oxymoron for introducing islam and facism into mainstream europe. From the article:

 

Some Dresdeners have updated an old East German tradition: The “Monday demos” that used to gather to protest against the Communist regime before 1989. In the past few weeks they been revived in the growing “PEGIDA” demonstrations against Islam. PEGIDA stands for “Patriotische Europäer Gegen die Islamisierung des Abendlandes” or “Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the West,” and associated demonstrations have sprung up in several cities around Germany – “Kagida” in Kassel, “Wügida” in Würzburg, “Bogida” in Bonn, and “Dügida” in Düsseldorf.

Meanwhile, the statements about Islam are aimed squarely at extremist groups: “We will not accept any ‘activities’ of IS, PKK, al Qaeda, or whatever they’re all called.” That statement is odd not only because the PKK is a Kurdish separatist group whose ideology is not Islamist but leftist, but also because membership in any of these groups is already illegal in Germany, although they are active here.

Nevertheless, according to some political scientists from Saxony, these demos should be put in a different bracket than the “Hooligans against Salafists” demo that took in Cologne earlier this year. “If 10,000 people take to the streets, then this is something broader,” said Werner Patzelt, founder of the Institute of Political Science at Dresden Technical University. “According to the police, there are 400 to 500 far-right extremists and violent supporters of a Dresden football club among them, but the majority are completely normal people. Of course, they’re not people who usually vote Green, or the Left party, or the SPD [Social Democrats], but they’re not extremists.”

But Patzelt thinks the politicians would do well not to dismiss the demonstrations. “The demand is a thorough debate about immigration policy,” he told DW. “That hasn’t been fulfilled yet. Superficial reactions, like the Saxon interior minister’s suggestion to introduce a special police unit for foreigner or asylum seeker criminality, are useless. That doesn’t touch the problem. What would be really helpful is an increasing willingness among local politicians to talk about these problems. There needs to be a discussion about what kind of immigrant policy the country wants – and what kind of integration policy is possible.”

 

“Of course, they’re not people who usually vote Green, or the Left party, or the SPD [Social Democrats], but they’re not extremists.”

So people who vote left (a communist party) or Green (a party founded by a nazi and accept to have in there ranks paedophiles) are mainstraem, while others are regaded “extremists”?